This case involves an appeal from a plea of privilege in a suit brought under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann., § 17.01, et seq. The decision of the court of civil appeals conflicts with the decision in
Moore v. White,
Conflict with
Moore v. White
was not alleged in petitioner’s original application for writ of error, and the application for writ of error was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
John Farrell Lumber Co. v. Wood,
The court of civil appeals held herein that in a suit under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act venue is proper pursuant to Section 17.56, as amended in 1977, in a county in which the defendant “has done business” where the venue fact proved is the single transaction which is the basis of the suit. We agree.
Accordingly, the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
