History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lee v. State
230 So. 2d 478
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1970
Check Treatment
OWEN, Judge.

The history of this case is set forth in our prior opinion, Lee v. State, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 861. In the cited case we reversed an order denying a motion to vacate under Rule 1.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A., and remanded with directions to afford appellant an evidentiary hearing. Such a hearing was held, as a result of which the trial court found that the allegations of the motion to vacate were not proved, resulting in an order again denying such motion. The present appeal is from that order.

While the appeal was pending, appellant completed serving the term of his sentence and was released from custody. Such fact having been brought to our attention, we . sua sponte dismiss the appeal as moot. DeHoff v. Imeson, 1943, 153 Fla. 553, 15 So.2d 258.

Appeal dismissed.

McCAIN, J., and ADAMS, ALTO, (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Lee v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 23, 1970
Citation: 230 So. 2d 478
Docket Number: No. 69-259
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.