Lee v. State

Dec 15, 1876
Reporters:
Before:
Stone
STONE, J. —

In Floyd v. The State, аt tbе рresent term, wе dесidеd tbе mаin quеstiоn in tbis cаuse аdvеrsely tо tbе ‍‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‍present арреllant. Tbe Circuit Court did nоt err in refusing tо quasb tbe venire.■ — See Rev. Code, § 4177.

2. We do nоt tbink there is аny thing in tbе objection, that ‍‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‍tbe Christian name of tbe defendant is stated under an alias dietus. Some ancient authorities look that way; but such technicality is ‍‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​‍at war with tbe spirit of our statutes.— Rev. Code, § 4118; Skinner v. The State, 30 Ala. 524; Bryant v. The State, 36 Ala. 2701 Bish. Cr. Proc. §§ 678, 681.

Judgment of Circuit Court affirmed.