History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lee v. State
37 Ga. App. 128
Ga. Ct. App.
1927
Check Treatment
Bboyles, C. J.

1. The single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial was based upon the alleged newly discovered testimony. However, the ground was not accompanied by an affidavit of the witness, and no reason was given for its non-production. The ground, therefore, was fatally defective. Berry v. State, 10 Ga. 511 (14) ; Suggs v. Anderson, 12 Ga. 461 (3), 464; White v. Wallen, 17 Ga. 106 (2); Burge v. State, 133 Ga. 431 (2) (66 S. E. 243).

2. The verdict whs amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworih, JJ., eoneur.

Case Details

Case Name: Lee v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 14, 1927
Citation: 37 Ga. App. 128
Docket Number: 18209
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.