History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leduc v. . Moore
113 N.C. 275
N.C.
1893
Check Treatment

The petitioner bases his application for a writ of certiorari upon the allegation that in the court below plaintiff's counsel orally accepted notice of his appeal and extended the time for stating the case. It is conceded that the record in that court does not show that an appeal was asked at the trial, or that any notice of an appeal was waived or accepted, or that the time for stating the case was extended. The plaintiff's counsel denies that he made any such agreement. *Page 203 His denial puts an end to the matter, for we cannot undertake to decide between them, but must adhere strictly to the rule of this Court (No. 39) and follow the decisions heretofore made in the like cases, the latest of which is Sondley v. Asheville, 112 N.C. 694.

Motion denied.

Cited: Smith v. Smith, 119 N.C. 313.

Case Details

Case Name: Leduc v. . Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1893
Citation: 113 N.C. 275
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.