Ledbetter-Johnson Co. v. Black
268 Ala. 151
Ala.
1958
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

GOODWYN, Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendant below from a judgment of the ¿circuit court of DeKalb County rendered on a jury verdict awarding property damages to the plaintiffappellee in the amount of $7,500. The action arises out of the same blasting incident as that involved in Ledbetter-Johnson Company v. Hawkins, Ala.Sup., 103 So.2d 748.1 The decision in that case appears to be dis-positive of the questions presented in the instant case. Accordingly, the judgment in this case is due to be affirmed on the authority of the Hawkins case, supra. So ordered.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON, MERRILL and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

. 267 Ala. 458.



Rehearing

On Rehearing

GOODWYN, Justice.

It is insisted that this case, in some material respects, is different from the case of Ledbetter-Johnson Company v. Hawkins, Ala., 103 So.2d 748.1 In deference to the earnestness of counsel we have again examined the record in full and still consider the decision in the Hawkins case to be of controlling influence. The identity of issues in the .two cases was recognized by counsel for appellant who, in seeking a continuance in the instant case, stated as follows: “* * * [T]he issues involved in this case and case No. 48 [Hawkins case, supra], which was tried and now appealed to the Supreme Court, are the same issues and the testimony will be largely the same, and that this case should not be tried until the Supreme Court passes on that one.”

Application overruled.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON, MERRILL and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.