History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leavens v. Butler
8 Port. 380
Ala.
1839
Check Treatment

To recapitulate, we are of opinion—

First — That the County court cannot decree distribution of'an estate against the executor where by so doing the testator’s intentions would be defeated.

Second — That in the present case, the decree of the County court, if sustained, would most probably defeat the testator’s intent

*403Third — That a legatee cannot, in all cases, immediately after the expiration of eighteen months from the grant of letters testamentary, coerce a payment of his legacy.

Fourth — That the decree of the County court is erroneous, in assuming jurisdiction over- the lands of the tes tator, without the limits of this State.

Fifth — That a court of chancery,has ample power over the subject of legacies, and in such cases can administer complete justice — and in the present case, that tribunal is peculiarly appropriate for the adjustment of the rights of all interested under the will.

It remains but to add, that the decree of the County court must be reversed, and the cause remanded,

GOLDTI-IWAITE, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Leavens v. Butler
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1839
Citation: 8 Port. 380
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.