History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leatherberry v. Radcliffe
15 F. Cas. 115
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1839
Check Treatment

But the Court overruled the objections, and permitted the deposition to be read, being of opinion that it was sufficient for'the plaintiff to show, at the time of trial, that the witness was “ gone” “ to a greater distance than one hundred miles from the place of trial; ” and that the return of a subpoena, non est, is only one means of making that fact appear to the satisfaction of the Court, but not the only means.

Note. The Court being bound by law to hold a session in Alexandria on the 6th of May, adjourned on Saturday, the 4th, to Monday, the 20th of May, and in the mean time sat nine days in Alexandria.

Case Details

Case Name: Leatherberry v. Radcliffe
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Mar 15, 1839
Citation: 15 F. Cas. 115
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.