Learning Annex Holdings, LLC, Appellant, v Martin Gittelman, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
July 6, 2006
[850 NYS2d 422]
Dismissal of the complaint was appropriate in this action where plaintiff seeks damages based on defendant‘s admitted actions of removing every copy of plaintiff‘s catalogue from its magazine/catalogue distribution box located on a street corner in defendant‘s neighborhood and throwing them in the garbage because, in his view, they contributed to litter in the area. The record evidence establishes that plaintiff‘s cause of action for tortious interference with prospective business relations is not viable since plaintiff has failed to identify any specific customers it would have obtained but for defendant‘s actions (see Vigoda v DCA Prods. Plus, 293 AD2d 265, 266-267 [2002]). The conversion cause of action fails because plaintiff admits that the catalogues are free for the taking and anyone can take as many as they desire and therefore, plaintiff cannot demonstrate a superior possessory right to the catalogues (see Galtieri v Kramer, 232 AD2d 369 [1996]). Furthermore, dismissal of the
