Leahy v. KontosLeahy v. Kontos
In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berman, J.), dated July 11, 1984, which, upon the motion of the defendants for judgment as a matter of law following the conclusion of the presentation of evidence by the parties, dismissed his complaint for failure to make out a prima facie case.
Judgment reversed, on the law, motion denied, and new trial granted with costs to abide the event.
Pursuant to the very limited standard of review in this case, in which we must afford plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn from the evidence, and despite the inherent improbability of plaintiff’s version of the facts and the inconsistencies permeating plaintiff’s presentation of evidence, we conclude that he should have been given the opportunity to have the jury determine the extent, if any, to which defendants’ actions contributed to the happening of the accident (see, Santiago v Steinway Trucking,