91 Mass. 212 | Mass. | 1864
1. The plaintiff having put into the case his discharge in insolvency, for the purpose of showing want of proba- ¡ ble cause in the suit instituted by the defendant, it seems quite clear that, any evidence tending to invalidate the discharge was relevant and proper.
2. The evidence of the witnesses as to statements made by the plaintiff was competent.
3. The instruction to the jury upon the subject of damages was sufficient, in the absence of any request for more specific directions.
4 No sufficient ground is shown for sustaining the exception to the ruling of the court overruling the motion of the plaintiff for a new trial on account of the alleged misconduct and irregularity on the part of the jury and the officer having charge oí