History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leach v. Lothian
10 Colo. 439
Colo.
1887
Check Treatment
Stallcup, C.

The appellants were defendants below. The errors assigned are as follows: “(1) The court erred in not passing upon defendants’ motion for a new trial; (2) the court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s objection to the several offers of proof by defendants of failure of consideration of the note in suit; (3) the court erred in giving judgment for the plaintiff upon the whole record.” The record shows no error in the proceedings and judgment of the court below. There were no exceptions taken there, and the evidence is not shown here. There is no *440foundation for the said supposed errors assigned, as the matters upon which they are supposed to rest are not at all shown by the record here. The judgment should be affirmed.

We concur: Rising, C.; Macon, C.

By the Court.

For the reasons assigned in the foregoing opinion the judgment of the superior court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Leach v. Lothian
Court Name: Supreme Court of Colorado
Date Published: Oct 15, 1887
Citation: 10 Colo. 439
Court Abbreviation: Colo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.