History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leach v. California
53 S. Ct. 313
SCOTUS
1933
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U. S. 539; Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co., 242 U. S. 559; Merrick v. N. W. Halsey & Co., 242 U. S. 568; Sloman v. Security Trust Co., 281 U. S. 704; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U. S. 86, 109; Bandini Co. v. Superior Court, 284 U. S. 8, 18; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U. S. 374, 393.

Case Details

Case Name: Leach v. California
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 9, 1933
Citation: 53 S. Ct. 313
Docket Number: No. 441
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.