OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
The appellant was convicted in a non-jury trial of aggravated sexual assault. Punishment was assessed by the court at forty years in the penitentiary.
The testimony of the child victim was introduced into evidence through a videotaped interview with the victim, as then authorized by Art. 38.071, § 2, V.A.C.C.P.
In his appeal to the court of appeals, and consistent with his trial objection, the appellant claimed that the videotaped interview of the victim was made after the
While the State’s petitions for discretionary review were pending, this Court decided Long v. State,
In Mallory v. State,
