History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lawry v. Lawry
88 Me. 482
Me.
1896
Check Treatment
Foster, J.

Trespass quare clausum for cutting standing-trees on a lot of land the plaintiff owned in remainder, the-widow of his father having a life estate therein as her dower.

The question is, whether this action can be maintained in its. present form by the plaintiff whose interest is only that of' remainder-man. We think it cannot.

Trespass quare clausum is a possessory action. To maintain! it, it is necessary to show possession in the plaintiff and the-injury committed. Jones v. Leeman, 69 Maine, 489, and cases, cited; Bartlett v. Perkins, 13 Maine, 87; 1 Ch. Pl. 175*.

Though quare clausum may be maintained by the owner of the land for an injury to the freehold, when it is in the occupation of a tenant at will, (Bartlett v. Perkins, 13 Maine, 87; Davis v. Nash, 32 Maine 411; Kimball v. Sumner, 62 Maine, 305, 309; Starr v. Jackson, 11 Mass. 519,) yet we do not think this doctrine is to be extended so as to apply to the remainder-man who is not entitled to possession. It has been held that such an action will not lie by the reversioner for waste committed by a person acting under authority of the tenant for life. Shattuck v. Gragg, 23 Pick. 88. But the reversioner or remainder-man is not without remedy when the injury is of a permanent character affecting the inheritance, for an action *484would lie, either on the ease or for waste. Stetson v. Day, 51 Maine, 434: Shattuck v. Gragg, supra.

The amendment changing the declaration to case ought not to be allowed.

True, the statute has abolished the distinction between actions of trespass and trespass on the case. But this relates to the distinction in form only. In cases where the distinction is really of substance, rather than of form, the statute is inapplicable. Place v. Brann, 77 Maine, 342; Sawyer v. Goodwin, 34 Maine, 419; Kelly v. Bragg, 76 Maine, 207.

Such an amendment is more than a matter of form. It changes the nature of the action. Sawyer v. Goodwin, supra. This is not allowable. Milliken v. Whitehouse, 49 Maine, 527; Farmer v. Portland, 63 Maine, 46, 48.

It will not be wise to depart too far from the established rules of pleading. Constant departures from these rules will soon result in confusion. In the end it will be found that justice will be better subserved by adhering to the remedies provided by law than in departing from them. Shorey v. Chandler, 80 Maine, 409, 411.

Plaintiff nonsuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Lawry v. Lawry
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Feb 15, 1896
Citation: 88 Me. 482
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.