History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lawrence v. Stephens
20 Ga. App. 279
Ga. Ct. App.
1917
Check Treatment
Bkoyles, P. J.

1. Under the facts as disclosed by the- record, the plea in abatement, which was filed by the defendant and allowed by the court, set up no valid defense to the plaintiff’s suit, and the court did not err in thereafter striking it on an oral motion made by the plaintiff’s counsel.

2. The plea in abatement having been stricken, and the defendant having introduced no evidence to sustain his other pleas, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the full amount sued for.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Sibley & Sibley, for plaintiff in error, cited:

Howes v. Chester, 33 Ga. 90; Cook v. Ga. Land Co., 120 Ga. 1068 (1); Merritt v. Bagwell, 70 Ga. 578 (3a); Civil Code (1910), §§ 4331, 5678; Rogers v. Hoskins, 15 Ga. 270, 273.

Allen & Pottle, contra, cited:

Augusta R. Co. v. Dorsey, 68 Ga. 228 (2); Dykes v. McVay, 67 Ga. 502; Heath v. Bates, 70 Ga. 633; Civil Code (1910), § 5522; Georgia Mills &c. Co. v. Clarke, 112 Ga. 253 (2); Clark v. Havard, 122 Ga. 274.

Case Details

Case Name: Lawrence v. Stephens
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1917
Citation: 20 Ga. App. 279
Docket Number: 8402
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.