History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lawrence v. Clarke
2:16-cv-00235
E.D. Va.
Jan 20, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:16-cv-00235-AWA-LRL Document 12 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 112

FILED JAN I 0 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Norfolk Division clerk, u^;^DisrRiCT court ROBERT ALLEN LAWRENCE, Petitioner, V. ACTION NO. 2:16-cv-235 HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent. FINAL ORDER

Before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) filed pursuant lo 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5). On June 23, 2014, the New Kent County Circuit Court found Petitioner was in violation of his probation stemming from a conviction on September 18, 2006, for unlawful filming of a minor, production of child pornography, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor in the New Kent County Circuit Court. Petitioner was sentenced to serve three years of his suspended sentence for revocation of probation.'

The matter was referred for disposition to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b){l)(B)-(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), Local Civil Rule 72, and the April 2, 2002 Standing Order on Assignment of Certain Matters to United States Magistrate Judges. In a Report and Recommendation entered on December 14, 2016 (ECF No. 11), the Magistrate Judge recommended the motion to dismiss be granted, and the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the ' Petitioner was originally sentenced to fifteen years in jail with fourteen years and six months suspended and a twelve monthjail sentence with all twelve months suspended, for his September 18, 2006 conviction. *2 Case 2:16-cv-00235-AWA-LRL Document 12 Filed 01/20/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 113

Report and Recommendation. Neither the Petitioner nor the Respondent filed objections with the Court.

Having reviewed the record and having heard no objection, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation on tiie grounds stated by the Magistrate Judge and ADOPTS and APPROVES the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) in its entirety as the Court's own opinion. Accordingly, the Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED, and the Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent.

The Pethioner is hereby notified that he may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a wriiien noticc of appeal with the Clerk of the Court at the Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date judgment is entered, Because the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003).

The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to the Petitioner and counsel of record for the Respondent. It is so ORDERED. Arenda VjVrighL United StateslTIstiict Judge

Arenda L. Wright Allen United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia /• g.0 (cid:127) n

Case Details

Case Name: Lawrence v. Clarke
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Virginia
Date Published: Jan 20, 2017
Docket Number: 2:16-cv-00235
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.