History
  • No items yet
midpage
Law v. State
106 Ga. App. 782
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1962
|
Check Treatment
106 Ga. App. 782 (1962)
128 S.E.2d 204

LAW
v.
THE STATE.

39712.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided October 24, 1962.

*783 George G. Finch, for plaintiff in error.

Paul Webb, Solicitor General, Eugene L. Tiller, contra.

FRANKUM, Judge.

The defendant's guilt of larceny of an automobile being wholly dependent upon the inference arising from the possession of a part of the stolen automobile after the theft, and this possession being shown by uncontradicted and unimpeached testimony to be consistent with his innocence, the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and a new trial should have been granted. King v. State, 99 Ga. 686 (26 S.E. 480, 59 ASR 251); Williams v. State, 125 Ga. 268 (54 S.E. 166); Hampton v. State, 6 Ga. App. 778 (65 S.E. 816); Gibbs v. State, 8 Ga. App. 107 (68 S.E. 742); Brooks v. State, 21 Ga. App. 661 (94 S.E. 810); Slaughter v. State, 24 Ga. App. 428 (100 S.E. 774); Denson v. State, 26 Ga. App. 427 (106 S.E. 732); Willis v. State, 33 Ga. App. 352 (126 S.E. 303).

Judgment reversed. Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Law v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 24, 1962
Citation: 106 Ga. App. 782
Docket Number: 39712
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.