History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lavern Speer and Champlain McCrea v. United States
388 F.2d 110
9th Cir.
1968
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

Appellants, convicted of smuggling amphetamine tablets into the United States, list nine instances in which their appointed trial counsel might have acted otherwise than he did. They conclude that they did not have adequate assistance of counsel or a fair trial and that the District Court erred in not acting sua sponte on their behalf. We fail to see how action by trial counsel in any of these instances could have resulted in a favorable ruling or otherwise altered the result in appellants’ favor. The cumulation adds neither weight nor substance. *111 Nor do we think the district judge should on his own motion have granted a judgment of acquittal on behalf of either appellant.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Lavern Speer and Champlain McCrea v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 24, 1968
Citation: 388 F.2d 110
Docket Number: 21677
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.