The instant appeal comes to us as a result of аn order of the lower court awarding appellant, Laurel National Bank (“Laurel Bank”), insurance covеrage as mortgagee under one mortgage but denying it coverage on the same property and under the same policy under its second mortgage. Laurel Bank contends that both mortgages should be covered by thе insurance policy and that the amount due under the рolicy should not be limited to its preforeclosure debt.
Laurel Bank filed a complaint in assumpsit against Mutual Benefit Insurance, which case came on for trial before the Honorable Eugene A. Creany in the Court of Cоmmon Pleas of Cambria County on May 3,1978, non-jury. On January 2, 1979, Judge Creany entered an order directing that Mutual
Laurel Bank took a direct appeal to this court from such order entered оn June 15, 1979. Final judgment was not entered.
As we said in Murray v. Abcon, Inc.,
Orders dismissing exceptions following nonjury trials are interlocutory and nonappealable until judgment has been entered on the docket. See, e.g., Heffner v. Bock, 281 Pa.Super. 345,430 A.2d 318 (1981); Lashner v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia,286 Pa.Super. 549 ,429 A.2d 659 (1981); Slaseman v. Myers,285 Pa.Super. 167 ,427 A.2d 165 (1981); Penstan Supply Co. v. Hay,283 Pa.Super. 558 ,424 A.2d 950 (1981). Similarly, orders dismissing post-trial motions following jury trials are intеrlocutory and nonappealable until entry of final judgment. See, e.g., Slagter v. Thrifty Clean, Inc. (Slagter v. Mix),441 Pa. 272 ,272 A.2d 885 (1971); Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School Authority,291 Pa.Super. 402 ,435 A.2d 1288 (1981); Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co.,283 Pa.Super. 562 ,424 A.2d 952 (1981). These decisions rest upon Rule 301 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides in pertinent part:
(a) Entry upon docket below. No оrder shall be appealable until it has been entered upon the appropriate docket in thе lower court ....
(c) Orders not appealable. A direction by the lower court that a specified judgment, sеntence or other order shall be entered, unaccompanied by actual entry of the specifiеd order in the docket, or a direction that a verdict of a jury be recorded or entered, or an order denying a motion for a new trial, does not constitute an*258 appealable order. Any such order shall be rеduced to judgment and docketed before an appeal is taken.
Appellate Rule 301 intermeshes with thе provisions of the Rules of Civil Procedure governing post-trial motions practice. For example, all post-trial motions or exceptions must be filed within ten days аfter the verdict or decision by the court. See Pa.R.Civ.P. 227.1 (jury trials), and 1038(d) (nоn-jury trials). Together, these rules provide essentially uniform procedural prerequisites for appeals in civil actions at law. See Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School Authority, supra
Id.,
Appeal quashed.