midpage

Laur & Mack Contracting Co. v. Di CienzoLaur & Mack Contracting Co. v. Di Cienzo

New York Court of Appeals
Jul 10, 2001
Versions:96 N.Y.2d 895

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Russell Associates, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Case Details

Case Name: Laur & Mack Contracting Co. v. Di Cienzo
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 10, 2001
Citation: 96 N.Y.2d 895
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In