206 Pa. 90 | Pa. | 1903
Appellant petitioned to have the judgment opened on the ground that be was overcharged, but his evidence failed to sustain his complaint, it appearing clearly that he had received a postal card with notice of each consignment charged to him, had made no complaint at the times, and had gone over his account at the plaintiff’s office, agreed upon a balance and paid it, at a date subsequent to many of the items he now objects to.
In this court he makes the additional claim that he was described in the bond as agent, but that the goods were charged to him as a purchaser, and the debt therefore is not within the
Judgment affirmed.