History
  • No items yet
midpage
Larue v. Gaskins
5 Cal. 507
Cal.
1855
Check Treatment
Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

The transfer of the cause from the Justice’s to the District Court, was illegal, and cannot defeat the plaintiff’s rights by operating a dis? continuance.

After the decision of this Court, the case stood on the docket .as if no transfer had ever been made, and it was his duty to proceed and try it. Being disqualified by the statute, he should have transferred it.

Thé Court below is directed to issue a peremptory mandamus.

Case Details

Case Name: Larue v. Gaskins
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1855
Citation: 5 Cal. 507
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.