128 Mass. 561 | Mass. | 1880
The plaintiff was injured by falling into a trench near a public building used for a town-house and school-house, and brought this action of tort against the town to recover dam ages for the injury. It is not contended that the town is liable as for a defect in a highway. The trench was not in the highway, nor in dangerous proximity to it. But the plaintiff contends that the trench was in dangerous proximity to the way or path leading to the town-house; and that the town is liable to the same extent as a private owner who invites persons to enter his hall would be. If we assume, in favor of the plaintiff, that, upon the evidence, a private owner would be liable to her for her injury, yet we are of opinion that the town is not liable. The only ground upon which it is contended that a city or town is liable for defects in, or negligence in the repair or management of, a building owned by it, is that, at the time the liability attaches, it is using the building for emolument or profit, as a private owner might. Oliver v. Worcester, 102 Mass. 489. Hill v. Boston, 122 Mass. 344. In the present case, this element of liability is wanting. The plaintiff visited the townhouse for the purpose of attending an entertainment given by