Larkin v. Wikoff
77 N.J. Eq. 589
N.J.
1910
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13.

For reversal — None.