L.A.R. v. State, No. 89-1379

No. 89-1379 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Jul 12, 1990

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the restitution order. The losses on which the order was based were clearly not caused by the offenses to which appellant pled guilty. The remaining charge was nolle-prossed on a negotiated plea with no reservation for restitution.

REVERSED.

DANIEL, C.J., and COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.