Lapieduse v. . Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company
187 N.Y. 561
NY1907Check Treatment
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J.; EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ., concur on the ground that the alleged errors were so cured by the subsequent charge as to become harmless; GRAY and WILLARD BARTLETT, JJ., dissent upon the ground that it was error to leave the case with the jury upon the instruction that there was a legal presumption that the plaintiff was not sui juris.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
