Laourdakis v. TorresLaourdakis v. Torres
The finding of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see
A preponderance of the evidence shows that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate the mother’s parental rights to free him for adoption by the foster parents, who have provided the special needs child with good care since shortly after birth (see Matter of Paul Michael G., 36 AD3d 541, 542 [1st Dept 2007]). A suspended judgment was not warranted, especially where the mother had failed to comply with court orders prohibiting unsupervised visits with the child (id.). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Richter, JJ.