History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lanzone v. Cariola
279 A.D. 980
N.Y. App. Div.
1952
Check Treatment

Memorandum: On the record before us, it clearly appears that the plaintiffs unnecessarily neglected for approximately six years to take any proceedings to enter judgment upon the defendant’s default, although in their power to do so. No sufficient reason is shown excusing such neglect. Under the circumstances, the judgment and orders appealed from should be affirmed. We treat the motion as having been made under rule 302 of the Rules of Civil Practice. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment and order of Monroe Special Term, granting dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint for failure to prosecute an action in negligence brought in 1939; also appeal from order of Monroe Special Term, denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate the previous order and for a reargument of such motion.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Lanzone v. Cariola
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 20, 1952
Citation: 279 A.D. 980
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.