History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lansing v. Lansing
8 Johns. 454
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1811
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plaintiff below took the note, after it had become due, and subject, therefore, to every defence which existed against it, in the hands of the original payee. This case falls within the principle laid down in Bunn v. Piker, (4 Johns. Rep. 426.) that a bet involving an inquiry into the validity of the election of the governor, was void, on principles of policy. The, judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Lansing v. Lansing
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1811
Citation: 8 Johns. 454
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.