| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | Oct 15, 1811

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff below took the note, after it had become due, and subject, therefore, to every defence which existed against it, in the hands of the original payee. This case falls within the principle laid down in Bunn v. Piker, (4 Johns. Rep. 426.) that a bet involving an inquiry into the validity of the election of the governor, was void, on principles of policy. The, judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.