History
  • No items yet
midpage
Langham v. State
127 S.E. 302
Ga. Ct. App.
1925
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The three special grounds of the motion for a new trial (one the ground of newly discovered evidence, one the ground that a material witness for the State desired to change his evidence, and the other the ground of incompetency of one of the jurors) are without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Langham v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 27, 1925
Citation: 127 S.E. 302
Docket Number: 16225
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.