History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lang v. State
76 N.J.L. 829
N.J.
1909
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons set out in the opinion delivered in that court.

It is not to be assumed from the fact of this affirmance, or from any language in the opinion adopted, that this court decides that the question of the insanity of a person who is in confinement awaiting execution under a capital sentence can be tested by a proceeding taken under section 13 of the act of 1906. Pamph. L., p. 722.

This question was not argued and not considered.

For a-ffirmance—Ti-ib Chanoellob, Ci-iiee Justice, Reed, Trbnchakd, Beegen, Yoobi-ibes, Bogbrt, Yeedenbuegh, Obay, Dill, J.J. 10.

For reversal—None.

Case Details

Case Name: Lang v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 29, 1909
Citation: 76 N.J.L. 829
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.