History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lang, Fisher & Stashower Advertising, Inc. v. Collins
347 N.E.2d 538
Ohio
1976
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The “60-day letter” or notice of intent to levy an assessment is not a final determination that Lang, Fisher & Stashower Advertising, Inc., is a vendor. Of course, the notice reflects the view held by the Tax Commissioner at that time that appellant was a vendor. However, the' notice is not a final determination by the commissioner. Until such time as the commissioner makes a. final determination, the initial determination expressed in the notice is subject to modification or review by him.

Since the notice is .not a final determination by the Tax Commissioner, the Board of Tax Appeals correctly found that it was without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. R. C. 5717.02'; Michelin Tire Corp. v. Kosydar (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 254, 313 N. E. 2d 394.

For the foregoing .reason, the' decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. . .

Decision affirmed...

. O’Neinl, C. J., Herbert, Córrigán,'Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Lang, Fisher & Stashower Advertising, Inc. v. Collins
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 26, 1976
Citation: 347 N.E.2d 538
Docket Number: No. 75-1167
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.