Lane v. State

Sep 3, 1992
No. 78534
Versions:603 So. 2d 510
17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582
1992 Fla. LEXIS 1564
1992 WL 212015

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. *511Lane, 582 So.2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Lane’s community control and probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs. McDONALD, J., dissents.



Dissenting Opinion

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.