Lane v. State

603 So. 2d 510 | Fla. | 1992

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. Lane, 582 So.2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Lane’s community control and probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs. McDONALD, J., dissents.

---

Dissenting Opinion

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.