Lane v. State, 710 S.W.2d 354

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial without a hearing of his Rule 27.26 motion which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at a probation revocation hearing. A Rule 27.26 motion is not the proper procedure by which to challenge the effectiveness of *355counsel at a probation revocation hearing, The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Lane v. State

Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals

Date Published: Apr 1, 1986

Citations: 710 S.W.2d 354; 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3925; No. 50419

Docket Number: No. 50419

Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.