History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lane v. Sochacki
279 A.D. 595
N.Y. App. Div.
1951
Check Treatment

Ho opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: The papers fail to include competent or sufficient evidence to warrant granting the application or to excuse the delay in making it. (See Kenney v. South Shore Natural Gas & Fuel Co., 126 App. Div. 236.)

Case Details

Case Name: Lane v. Sochacki
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 8, 1951
Citation: 279 A.D. 595
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.