History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lane v. Ivy
74 S.E. 782
Ga.
1912
Check Treatment
Fish, C. J.

“The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.” Civil. Code, § 6204. In this case it does not appear that the law and facts required the verdict, nor that the judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Case Details

Case Name: Lane v. Ivy
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 13, 1912
Citation: 74 S.E. 782
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.