History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lane v. Chantilly Corp.
225 A.D. 789
N.Y. App. Div.
1929
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.; Dowling, P. J., and Finch, J., dissent on the authority of McCarter v. Crawford (245 N. Y. 43).

Case Details

Case Name: Lane v. Chantilly Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1929
Citation: 225 A.D. 789
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.