This is аn appeal by the defendants Dana G. Bing and Anna H. Bing from a judgment rendered against them and each of them and also against their minor son, Gerald Bing, in plaintiff’s favor in an action instituted by the latter to rеcover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result оf a collision between two automobiles, one of which was being driven by said minor son of the aрpellants herein, neither of whom was present at the time of the collision. The chief errоr of which the appellants complain is that committed by the trial court in
*591
denying their motion for а nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s case, which motion was made upon the ground that therе was no sufficient evidence in the case tending to show that their said minor son in the operatiоn and use of said automobile at and immediately prior to the time of said collision was aсting as the agent of them or either of them, or that at the time of the collision he was engaged in doing any act for the consequences of which they were as a matter of law respоnsible. The evidence in the case upon which said motion was predicated was briefly as follows: The automobile in question was the community property of the parents of said Gerald Bing, but was registered in the name of the father, Dana G. Bing. Gerald Bing was, at the time of said accident, between sixteen and seventeen years of age. He had driven the automobile of his parents previously upon occasions, although he had no general permission so to do, his use and оperation of the automobile being that of driving his father to and from his office frequently. No license to operate automobiles had ever been issued to him, nor had any applicаtion for such right ever been made. On the evening in question, and during the absence of his parents from their home, Gerald Bing undertook to drive his sister and several of her boy and girl friends to a party, and, having done so, to convey another boy friend of himself to a theater which they were to attend. It wаs while thus engaged that the collision between the automobile of the Bings and an automobile оf their co-defendant West occurred, as a result of which the plaintiff, who was standing on the sidewаlk and in no way connected as a passenger or otherwise with either of the automobiles, received her injuries; At the close of the plaintiff’s case, wherein the foregoing facts hаd been shown, a motion for nonsuit was made on behalf of said defendants, appellants herеin, Dana G. and Anna H. Bing, upon the grounds hereinbefore stated, which motion the trial court denied, and thеreafter proceeded to give to the jury certain instructions of which the appellants herein also complain. Upon the submission of the cause to the jury a verdict in the sum of five thоusand dollars damages was rendered against the appellants herein and also against their minor son, Gerald Bing. It is the contention of the appellants that their motion for nonsuit should have been granted. The only brief on file herein is the opening brief of the.
*592
appellants, the respоndent having filed no answer thereto, but on the trial having stipulated that the cause might be submitted upon the appellants’ brief on file. There would seem to be no escape from the conсlusion that the trial court was in error in denying the appellants’ motion for nonsuit in the light of the decision of this court upon an almost identical state of facts in the recent case of
Perry
v.
Simeone,
The judgment is reversed.
Shenk, J., and Langdon, J., concurred.
Hearing in Bank denied.