midpage

Landrigan v. SchriroLandrigan v. Schriro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sep 4, 2007
00-99011
Versions:501 F.3d 1147
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21063
2007 WL 2473136

Dale A. Baich, Esq., Federal Public Defenders Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kent E. Cattani, Esq., Office of the Attorney General Civil Division, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.

ORDER

The mandate, issued on May 8, 2006, is recalled. In light of the Supreme Court‘s mandate, issued on July 30, 2007, in Schriro v. Landrigan, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 1933, 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007), we vacate our en banc decision, Landrigan v. Schriro, 441 F.3d 638 (9th Cir.2006), and affirm the district court‘s denial of an evidentiary hearing on Landrigan‘s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We again adopt the three-judge panel‘s holdings with respect to the additional sentencing issues raised on appeal, Landrigan v. Stewart, 272 F.3d 1221, 1229-31 (9th Cir.2001). Therefore, the district court‘s denial of Landrigan‘s petition for writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Landrigan v. Schriro
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 4, 2007
Citations: 501 F.3d 1147; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21063; 2007 WL 2473136; 00-99011
Docket Number: 00-99011
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In