History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lampp v. State
166 So. 2d 891
Fla.
1964
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon further consideration of this cause following oral argument, we have con-eluded that this Court does not have jurisdiction in the. matter. Thereupon, it is

Ordered that this appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed, Fla.App., 155 So.2d 10.

THOMAS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion. ROBERTS, J., dissents and agrees with DREW, C. J.





Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Chief Justice

(dissenting).

I think we have jurisdiction.

ROBERTS, J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Lampp v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 8, 1964
Citation: 166 So. 2d 891
Docket Number: No. 32959
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.