Lampp v. State, 166 So. 2d 891

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon further consideration of this cause following oral argument, we have con-eluded that this Court does not have jurisdiction in the. matter. Thereupon, it is

Ordered that this appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed, Fla.App., 155 So.2d 10.

THOMAS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion. ROBERTS, J., dissents and agrees with DREW, C. J.

---

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Chief Justice

(dissenting).

I think we have jurisdiction.

ROBERTS, J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Lampp v. State

Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida

Date Published: Jul 8, 1964

Citations: 166 So. 2d 891; 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2658; No. 32959

Docket Number: No. 32959

Court Abbreviation: Fla.