History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lamhoff v. Daniel
239 N.W. 334
Mich.
1931
Check Treatment

Plaintiff filed a bill for specific performance of an alleged agreement to lease made with defendants December 13, 1929. Defendants were the owners of real estate in Jackson, Michigan. The premises were leased by defendants to a tenant, Chris Tannis. Plaintiff had been a partner of Tannis, but had sold out his interest to Tannis. Plaintiff desired to get a lease of the premises. Defendants had lost their copy of the Tannis lease. Plaintiff's agent represented to defendants the Tannis lease expired August 1, 1930. In fact it expired August 1, 1931. Defendants relied upon the representations made by plaintiff's agent, in making the agreement sought to be enforced. They were mistaken as to the date or the expiration of the outstanding lease. This mistake was brought about by the misrepresentations of plaintiff's agent. Defendants were, deceived thereby. Plaintiff cannot ask specific performance or a contract entered into by defendants by mistake, which mistake was induced by the false representations or plaintiff's agent. The trial court so held. Decree affirmed, with costs.

BUTZEL, C.J., and WIEST, CLARE, McDONALD, SHARPE, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. *Page 335

Case Details

Case Name: Lamhoff v. Daniel
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 8, 1931
Citation: 239 N.W. 334
Docket Number: Docket No. 81, Calendar No. 35,680.
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.