Appellant Lake appeals an adverse judgment in the amount of $11,500 entered on a jury verdict in a breach of contract action. We affirm.
1. This trial was not reported and the trial judge refused to approve a proposed summary of evidence submitted by appellant. "There being no transcript or summary of evidence before this court, the enumerations of error requiring a consideration of the evidence are without merit.”
Nixdorf Enterprises, Inc. v. Bell,
2. The brief contains references to defendant’s exhibits (canceled checks and contracts) which were never submitted to the trial court and which do not appear in the record on appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s argument cannot be considered.
Harper v. Ga. S. & F. R. Co.,
3. Appellant argues that the judgment cannot stand because he never contracted with appellee individually. It is asserted that transactions between the litigants were made as corporations. These arguments must be rejected as unsupported.
Airport Assoc. v. Audioptic Instructional Devices, Inc.,
4. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to certify his proposed statement of facts and conclusions of law. Appellee did not consent to appellant’s *176 summary of the evidence and law.
"Since the case was tried before a jury, findings of fact and conclusions of law.. .were not required. [Cit.]”
Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta,
Appellant’s failure to comply with any of the methods provided by Code Ann. § 6-805 removes any possible error on the grounds asserted. See
Herring v. Herring,
Judgment affirmed.