28 Pa. 115 | Pa. | 1857
The opinion of the court was delivered by
We are entirely satisfied with the instructions given by the learned judge who presided upon this trial.
The plaintiff in error alleges: 1st. That the proceedings in the Orphans’ Court were void, because the petitioner for the partition had no interest in the estate. 2d. That the plaintiff below ought not to recover, because he was acting as attorney when he purchased the land in dispute.
It is a sufficient answer to these allegations to say: 1st. That the Orphans’ Court, by receiving the petition of Henry Shade, and by the subsequent proceeding, decided that the petitioner Henry
Judgment affirmed.