midpage

LaFlamme v. StateLaFlamme v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jun 19, 1991
No. 89-02343
Versions:586 So. 2d 66
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6365
1991 WL 110451
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s two convictions without discussion. We reverse his sentence on the lewd, lascivious, or indecent assault conviction because the trial court scored forty points for penetration under victim injury when it should have scored only twenty points for contact. See Daum v. State, 544 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 551 So.2d 462 (Fla.1989); O’Bright v. State, 508 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the same sentence because, even with the twenty fewer points, the defendant’s total points will still fall within the same permitted range.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ. concur.

Case Details

Case Name: LaFlamme v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 19, 1991
Citations: 586 So. 2d 66; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6365; 1991 WL 110451; No. 89-02343
Docket Number: No. 89-02343
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In