LaFemina v. LaFeminaLaFemina v. LaFemina
Versions:57 A.D.3d 856868 N.Y.2d 920
The defendant‘s remaining contentions were improperly raised for the first time in her reply brief (see Gorman v Town of Huntington, 47 AD3d 30, 39 [2007]).
Skelos, J.P., Lifson, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.