History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lacy v. Ezzard
243 U.S. 631
SCOTUS
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U. S. 1; Capital National Bank v. First National Bank of Cadiz, 172 U. S. 425; Union National Bank v. McBoyle, 243 U. S. 26. (2) Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Albers Commission Co., 223 U. S. 573, 591; Creswill v. Knights of Pythias, 225 U. S. 246, 261; Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. West Virginia, 236 U. S. 605, 609-610. (3) Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 60l, 611-612.

Case Details

Case Name: Lacy v. Ezzard
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 16, 1917
Citation: 243 U.S. 631
Docket Number: No. 619
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.