eta","0",{"name":"viewport","content":"width=device-width, initial-scale=1"}],["$","meta","1",{"charSet":"utf-8"}],["$","title","2",{"children":"Lacey v. United States, No. 92-6180"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"description","content":"\n Read Lacey v. United States, No. 92-6180 (SCOTUS 1993) for free with midpage's AI-powered interface. Search through and read midpage's comprehensive database of legal opinions.\n "}],["$","link","4",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/lacey-v-united-states-9124808"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"google-site-verification","content":"47d9HJfzq2q0OP3ZqpopFxgpQIsT0oBkwtraeH2SIpE"}],["$","link","6",{"rel":"icon","href":"/midpage.png"}]] 7:null c:null 24:T544,

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Crosby v. United States, 506 U.S. 255" date_filed="1993-01-13" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Crosby v. United States">506 U. S. 255 (

No. 92-6180 | SCOTUS | Feb 22, 1993