3 P.2d 305 | Cal. | 1931
The Industrial Accident Commission petitioned for hearing in this court after annulment by the District Court of Appeal of an award of compensation. The only question involved is whether the injured person was an employee or an independent contractor at the time he incurred the injury (loss of an eye) for which the compensation was awarded. *676
The respondent Simons was employed by petitioner La Franchi, owner of a ranch, to pick up brush in an orchard. The agreed price was thirty dollars, La Franchi stating, however, that he would see that Simons at least made wages out of the job. Both parties testified that if the work had not progressed satisfactorily La Franchi could have discharged Simons. All equipment for doing the work, including a horse and burner, was furnished by the owner. Simons, the employee, was more or less free to determine when he would do the work, so long as it was completed within a period of two months to permit of plowing, and he was apparently free to engage assistants, though the oral contract of employment was silent in this regard; but La Franchi exercised some control over the work.
[1] In Hillen v. Industrial Acc. Com.,
The findings of the commission are approved and the award is affirmed.
Langdon, J., Curtis, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., and Preston, J., concurred.
Rehearing denied. *677