187 F. 941 | 3rd Cir. | 1911
In the court below, the T- H. Gilmer Company, the owner of patent No. 723,379, granted March 24, 1903, to T. H. Gilmer, for an improvement in 'belting, 'filed a bill against Otto Geisel, charging him with infringing the seventh claim thereof. That, court found Geisel did not infringe, and from a decree dismissing the bill the Gilmer Company appealed to this court
The subject-matter of the case is so fully and satisfactorily stated by the court below in its opinion that a further opinion by this court could be but a repetition. We content ourselves with stating that in our judgment the decree of dismissal entered by the court below might well have been justified on the ground of claim 7 being invalid, as not predicated on any disclosure of the subject-matter thereof in the spec? ification. Hestonville, etc., Ry. Co. v. McDuffee, 185 Fed. 798; Rail
The decree of the court below dismissing this bill, is affirmed.